<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crystal ball for 2010 Cycling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natbikes.com/blog/2009/07/28/crystal-ball-for-2010-cycling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natbikes.com/blog/2009/07/28/crystal-ball-for-2010-cycling/</link>
	<description>my vagabiking life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 16:15:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vtralph</title>
		<link>http://natbikes.com/blog/2009/07/28/crystal-ball-for-2010-cycling/comment-page-1/#comment-17846</link>
		<dc:creator>vtralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natbikes.com/blog/?p=429#comment-17846</guid>
		<description>WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! He may be doped but at least he&#039;s putting his high profile to good use. The rest of us will do a fraction of the good work that Lance has done via his Cancer work. Do you know someone who has died from Cancer? 

Also, note that the assumption behind the V02 max, wattage, watt/kg, etc were pretty well deemed flawed by several experts. Let&#039;s try to be somewhat objective here. Do you really think Contador&#039;s is at 99.9? If not, then how can you believe the methodology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! He may be doped but at least he&#8217;s putting his high profile to good use. The rest of us will do a fraction of the good work that Lance has done via his Cancer work. Do you know someone who has died from Cancer? </p>
<p>Also, note that the assumption behind the V02 max, wattage, watt/kg, etc were pretty well deemed flawed by several experts. Let&#8217;s try to be somewhat objective here. Do you really think Contador&#8217;s is at 99.9? If not, then how can you believe the methodology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
